Propuesta metodológica para comparar calidad de diseños biofílicos

Authors

  • Patricia Frontera Universidad de Flores. LABIM . Buenos Aires; Argentina.
  • Ana Faggi Universidad de Flores. Facultad de Ingeniería. Buenos Aires; Argentina.
  • Regina Nabhen Universidad de Flores. Facultad de Ingeniería. Buenos Aires; Argentina.
  • Ana Saez Universidad de Flores. LABIM . Buenos Aires; Argentina.

Keywords:

diseño, bienestar, estímulos

Abstract

In the last decade, the emergence of bars and restaurants with biophilic design that connect their clients with Nature within the living space has increased in Buenos Aires. The positive design of these sites seeks to create aesthetic, functional, comfortable and healthy spaces that influence their well-being and constitutes a strategy to attract customers. These spaces stimulate pleasant sensations in users through multiple stimuli such as shapes, colors, textures, sounds, and aromas. The study proposes the analysis of the biophilic design in gastronomic establishments based on in situ surveys to categorize them by means of an index based on the multiple existing patterns. Through the application of the formulated tool, these features were surveyed in each of the sites, as well as the variables within the elements Earth, Water, Air, Fire, Sounds, Light, Vegetation, Aromas, Animals, Landscapes, Spatial Perceptions and food. The construction of the biophilia index arises from the sum of variables within each element. This allowed 9% of the establishments to be classified as very biophilic, 44% as biophilic and the rest as somewhat biophilic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wilson, E. (1984) Biophilia, the human bond with other species, Harvard University Press.

Ulrich, R.S. (1993). Biophilia, Biophobia and Natural Landscapes. In: S.R. Kellert & R.S. Wilson. The Biophilia Hypothesis (73-137). Washington: Island Press.

Hagerhall, C. et al. (2018). Biological mechanisms and neurophysiological responses to sensory impact from nature. In Van den Bossch, M. & Bird W. (Eds.) Nature and Public Health, p. 79-88. Oxford Textbooks.

Mc Harg, I. ( 1969). Proyectar con la Naturaleza Barcelona : Editorial Gustavo Gili, S.L.

Kellert, S.F., J.H. Heerwagen, & M.L. Mador (2008). Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science & Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Browning, W.D., Ryan, C.O., Clancy, J.O. (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design. New York: Terrapin Bright Green llc.

Browning W.D., Ryan C.O (2020). Nature Inside A biophilic design guide RIBA Publishing Londonhttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003033

Kaplan, R. & S. Kaplan (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Espinoza Moncayo S.X., Cabrera Guaman R.I. (2019). Diseño biofilico incorporado al espacio interior. Universidad de Azuay, Ecuador.

Published

2024-11-29

How to Cite

Frontera, P., Faggi , A., Nabhen, R., & Saez, A. (2024). Propuesta metodológica para comparar calidad de diseños biofílicos. Revista Argentina De Ingeniería, 22, 32–36. Retrieved from https://radi.org.ar/index.php/radi/article/view/54

Issue

Section

ARTÍCULOS